When I was small, the family would gather around the television at 6:30 and watch 15 minute long national news programs on the major networks. There was The Huntley-Brinkley Report and The CBS Evening News with Walter Cronkite. ABC had World News Tonight with John Daly, Howard K. Smith, and John Cameron Swayze. My parents trusted these guys. I trusted these guys.
Then in 1968, Walter Cronkite journeyed to Vietnam to report on the Tet offensive. He dropped all pretense of objectivity and stated overtly on national television that the Vietnam War was unwinnable. He used his position of objective authority to politicize the war, and sowed the seeds for the morphing of the 5th estate to what it is today; partisan, bias, and for the most part liberal. Cronkite became the role model for modern journalists. Factual reporting ceased, and we are the worst for it.
The problem is that modern day journalists want to have it both ways. They cloak themselves in the aura of objectivity. But every standardized measurement of numerous journalistic watch dog groups clearly shows that modern day journalists are overwhelmingly liberal…with 90% overtly identifying themselves as Democrats. This goes for print and broadcast media. The only media path with a clearly conservative bias is talk radio.
It is sad to watch. When I was working on my Masters Degree in History, we were taught that only The New York Times had the stature to be quoted as a primary source. No more. Its editorial left wing bias is overtly touted by its publisher, and that policy spills out onto the front page in such pitiful displays that it has forced it to the brink of bankruptcy. The same goes for the Boston Globe and the San Francisco Chronicle. The digital age has certainly taken its toll on these American icons, but the American public isn’t stupid. It knows bias when it sees it.
In my lifetime, I don’t think I have seen anything like quite like this past election cycle, where the media jumped into bed with Barack Obama. The media ceased covering the news to become the news. It wasn’t a surprise that Obama won the election after continual press fawning. The surprise was that he won by so little notwithstanding the press becoming a branch of his campaign.
This is dangerous stuff. The country is set up for the press to be critical of the government. It watches out for our interests. Objectivity is central to that function. It needs facts. It needs intelligence. It needs ideological neutrality. In 2009, the press, the House, the Senate, and the White House are of one mind…and 50% of the American public is skeptical of all of the above.
A case in point was CNN coverage of the tax Tea parties last week. Anderson Cooper, supposedly one of the new age journalistic stalwarts, degraded the demonstrators as “teabaggers” and all they did was “teabagging.” This is an urban (the politically correct word for ghetto) phrase for oral sex. I didn’t know what it meant. I was watching CNN for some factual coverage. So much for my view of Anderson Cooper as an objective journalist!
The mainstream media is attempting to redefine the “center” of the political spectrum by deliberately blurring the lines between news coverage and editorial opinion. People normally considered being in the center are now being portrayed as radical and extreme. If you are critical of the government, you are stupid and a “douche bag”, a phrase that has migrated to MSNBC from HBO’s Bill Maher’s Real Time. If you oppose Barack Obama, you are a racist. If you oppose gay marriage, you are a homophobe. It is unending.
What is scary is all pretense of objectivity is gone. Reporters have capitulated to criticism and are becoming more and more bias in their reporting. Congress talks about reinstating the “fairness” doctrine, but it will never happen because it would also apply to liberal media outlets, and ironically, Public Television and Radio where my tax dollars are used to promote a political agenda I oppose.
All of the above makes for frustration among the public with views differing from the liberal political line of the press. How deep that frustration goes, and how it manifests itself, contributes to the gathering storm.
Then in 1968, Walter Cronkite journeyed to Vietnam to report on the Tet offensive. He dropped all pretense of objectivity and stated overtly on national television that the Vietnam War was unwinnable. He used his position of objective authority to politicize the war, and sowed the seeds for the morphing of the 5th estate to what it is today; partisan, bias, and for the most part liberal. Cronkite became the role model for modern journalists. Factual reporting ceased, and we are the worst for it.
The problem is that modern day journalists want to have it both ways. They cloak themselves in the aura of objectivity. But every standardized measurement of numerous journalistic watch dog groups clearly shows that modern day journalists are overwhelmingly liberal…with 90% overtly identifying themselves as Democrats. This goes for print and broadcast media. The only media path with a clearly conservative bias is talk radio.
It is sad to watch. When I was working on my Masters Degree in History, we were taught that only The New York Times had the stature to be quoted as a primary source. No more. Its editorial left wing bias is overtly touted by its publisher, and that policy spills out onto the front page in such pitiful displays that it has forced it to the brink of bankruptcy. The same goes for the Boston Globe and the San Francisco Chronicle. The digital age has certainly taken its toll on these American icons, but the American public isn’t stupid. It knows bias when it sees it.
In my lifetime, I don’t think I have seen anything like quite like this past election cycle, where the media jumped into bed with Barack Obama. The media ceased covering the news to become the news. It wasn’t a surprise that Obama won the election after continual press fawning. The surprise was that he won by so little notwithstanding the press becoming a branch of his campaign.
This is dangerous stuff. The country is set up for the press to be critical of the government. It watches out for our interests. Objectivity is central to that function. It needs facts. It needs intelligence. It needs ideological neutrality. In 2009, the press, the House, the Senate, and the White House are of one mind…and 50% of the American public is skeptical of all of the above.
A case in point was CNN coverage of the tax Tea parties last week. Anderson Cooper, supposedly one of the new age journalistic stalwarts, degraded the demonstrators as “teabaggers” and all they did was “teabagging.” This is an urban (the politically correct word for ghetto) phrase for oral sex. I didn’t know what it meant. I was watching CNN for some factual coverage. So much for my view of Anderson Cooper as an objective journalist!
The mainstream media is attempting to redefine the “center” of the political spectrum by deliberately blurring the lines between news coverage and editorial opinion. People normally considered being in the center are now being portrayed as radical and extreme. If you are critical of the government, you are stupid and a “douche bag”, a phrase that has migrated to MSNBC from HBO’s Bill Maher’s Real Time. If you oppose Barack Obama, you are a racist. If you oppose gay marriage, you are a homophobe. It is unending.
What is scary is all pretense of objectivity is gone. Reporters have capitulated to criticism and are becoming more and more bias in their reporting. Congress talks about reinstating the “fairness” doctrine, but it will never happen because it would also apply to liberal media outlets, and ironically, Public Television and Radio where my tax dollars are used to promote a political agenda I oppose.
All of the above makes for frustration among the public with views differing from the liberal political line of the press. How deep that frustration goes, and how it manifests itself, contributes to the gathering storm.